[2013] FWCA 173 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Barwon Heads Community Enterprise Limited
(AG2012/13068)
BARWON HEADS COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE LIMITED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Banking finance and insurance industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SMITH | MELBOURNE, 9 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Barwon Heads Community Enterprise Limited Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Barwon Heads Community Enterprise Limited Enterprise Agreement 2012 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Barwon Heads Community Enterprise Limited. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 January 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899253 PR533010>
- AGLC
- Barwon Heads Community Enterprise Limited [2013] FWCA 173
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 173
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the provisions of the Agreement concerning dispute resolution and found that they did not adequately meet the statutory requirements for an efficient system. Specifically, the Agreement's dispute resolution provisions were considered to be inadequate because they did not provide for a timely and efficient process for resolving disputes, which is essential under the Act. The Commission noted that the provisions did not specify timelines for each stage of the dispute resolution process, which is necessary to ensure that disputes are resolved promptly and efficiently. The Commission also found that the Agreement did not provide for the possibility of independent review of decisions made under the Agreement, which is another requirement under the Act for an efficient dispute resolution system.
Given these findings, the Commission refused to approve the Agreement. The Commission held that the provisions for dispute resolution in the Agreement were not sufficient to meet the statutory requirements for an efficient system, and thus the Agreement did not comply with the Act. As a result, the application for approval of the Agreement was dismissed. The Commission's decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements include provisions for dispute resolution that are both fair and efficient, as required by the Act. The refusal of approval means that the Agreement cannot be implemented until the dispute resolution provisions are amended to comply with the statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.