BARTLETT & DENNY (No.3)

In *Bartlett & Denny (No.3)*, Newbrun J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application for interim parenting orders concerning two children. The dispute arose between the parents regarding the children's living arrangements and the extent of each parent's involvement in their upbringing.

The central legal issue before the Court was to determine what interim parenting orders would best serve the interests of the children, having regard to the principles enshrined in the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). This involved assessing the immediate needs of the children and the potential impact of various arrangements on their welfare and development during the interim period.

Newbrun J applied the paramountcy principle, which dictates that the best interests of the child are the sole consideration in determining parenting arrangements. The Court considered evidence relating to the children's current circumstances, their relationship with each parent, and any potential risks or benefits associated with proposed interim orders. The reasoning focused on maintaining stability and ensuring the children's safety and well-being while the substantive proceedings were ongoing. The Court ultimately made interim orders designed to provide a framework for the children's care and contact with both parents.