Barrick Mining Company (Australia) Pty Ltd v Barrick Administration Company Pty Ltd, in the matter of Barrick Mining Company (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case

[2018] FCA 1958

4 December 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Barrick Mining Company (Australia) Pty Ltd v Barrick Administration Company Pty Ltd, in the matter of Barrick Mining Company (Australia) Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1958 [2018] FCA 1958 4 December 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Barrick Mining Company (Australia) Pty Ltd v Barrick Administration Company Pty Ltd, in the matter of Barrick Mining Company (Australia) Pty Ltd, involved a dispute concerning the approval of a scheme of arrangement under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The plaintiff, Barrick Mining Company (Australia) Pty Ltd, sought approval for a scheme of arrangement with its sole shareholder, Barrick Administration Company Pty Ltd. The matter was heard by the Federal Court of Australia, with Justice Bromberg presiding. The primary legal issues the Court needed to address were whether the scheme of arrangement met the statutory requirements under section 411 of the Corporations Act, and if the Court should exempt the plaintiff from certain compliance obligations under section 411(11) of the Act.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Bromberg noted that the Court's role in approving a scheme of arrangement is not to substitute its view for that of the members or shareholders but to ensure that the process was fair and that the necessary statutory requirements were met. The Court found that the scheme was fair and reasonable in all the circumstances, and thus approved the scheme under section 411(4)(b) of the Act. Additionally, the Court granted an exemption from compliance with section 411(11) of the Act, which requires the plaintiff to give notice of the meeting to the members and creditors of the company. The Court concluded that the exemption was appropriate given the circumstances of the case, including the fact that the plaintiff and its sole shareholder had agreed to the scheme.

The Court further ordered the transfer of assets and liabilities from the plaintiff to the defendant, the continuation of legal proceedings by or against the defendant, and the deregistration of the plaintiff by ASIC. The Court also granted the defendant the authority to use and disclose information transferred from the plaintiff under the scheme, subject to the same terms and liabilities as held by the plaintiff. The Court reserved liberty to the parties to apply for any further orders necessary to give effect to the scheme.

The final orders of the Court included the approval of the scheme of arrangement, exemption from certain notice requirements, transfer of assets and liabilities, continuation of legal proceedings, deregistration of the plaintiff, authority for the defendant to use and disclose information, and reservation of liberty to apply for further orders. The plaintiff was also required to lodge an office copy of the orders with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Corporate Law & Governance

Legal Concepts

  • Scheme of Arrangement

  • Jurisdiction

  • Transfer of Assets and Liabilities

  • Deregistration