Barlow and Jarman (No. 2)

In *Barlow and Jarman (No. 2)*, Cronin J of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered an application for costs. The specific nature of the underlying dispute that led to this costs application is not detailed in the provided text.

The sole legal issue before the Court was whether the application for costs, filed by affidavit on 5 October 2017, should be granted.

Cronin J dismissed the application for costs. The reasoning behind this dismissal is not elaborated upon in the provided text.

The Court ordered that the application for costs by way of affidavit marked as filed on 5 October 2017 is dismissed.