Bardot and Benjamin
Case
•
[2013] FCCA 1024
•28 August 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
BARDOT & BENJAMIN
[2013] FCCA 1024
[2013] FCCA 1024
28 August 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Bardot and Benjamin*, Chief Judge Pascoe of the Family Court of Australia considered a dispute between parents concerning the future schooling arrangements for their child, [X]. The proceedings involved an application to vary existing orders regarding school fees and the attendance of [X] at a particular educational institution.
The central legal issues before the Court were the determination of which school [X] should attend from Term 4 2013 onwards, and the apportionment of private school fees and related expenses for both [X] and another child, [Y], in light of the proposed changes to [X]'s schooling. The Court was required to consider the existing orders and make a determination that reflected the best interests of the children.
Chief Judge Pascoe ordered that [X] attend [A] school from Term 4 2013 until the completion of her secondary schooling. This decision necessitated a variation of the previous order concerning the payment of school fees. The Court varied the order to stipulate that the Father would pay 67.23 percent and the Mother would pay 32.77 percent of the private school fees, related expenses, and school uniforms for [Y] at [S] Grammar School and for [X] at [W] until the end of Term 3 2013, and thereafter at [A] School until the completion of their respective secondary schooling. The Court also noted the parties' agreement to arrange further counselling sessions for [X].
The central legal issues before the Court were the determination of which school [X] should attend from Term 4 2013 onwards, and the apportionment of private school fees and related expenses for both [X] and another child, [Y], in light of the proposed changes to [X]'s schooling. The Court was required to consider the existing orders and make a determination that reflected the best interests of the children.
Chief Judge Pascoe ordered that [X] attend [A] school from Term 4 2013 until the completion of her secondary schooling. This decision necessitated a variation of the previous order concerning the payment of school fees. The Court varied the order to stipulate that the Father would pay 67.23 percent and the Mother would pay 32.77 percent of the private school fees, related expenses, and school uniforms for [Y] at [S] Grammar School and for [X] at [W] until the end of Term 3 2013, and thereafter at [A] School until the completion of their respective secondary schooling. The Court also noted the parties' agreement to arrange further counselling sessions for [X].
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
BARDOT & BENJAMIN
[2013] FCCA 1024
Most Recent Citation
Sander and Sander [2016] FCCA 568
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Goode & Goode
[2006] FamCA 1346
Sayer v Radcliffe
[2012] FamCAFC 209
Sayer v Radcliffe
[2012] FamCAFC 209