Banks and Loffler
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 62
•12 February 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Banks and Loffler [2018] FamCA 62
[2018] FamCA 62
12 February 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Banks and Loffler, Berman J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia made orders concerning the parental responsibility and living arrangements for a child born in 2011. The dispute centred on the arrangements for the child following the breakdown of the parents' relationship, with the court ultimately determining the primary care and communication protocols between the parents.
The court was required to determine who should have sole parental responsibility for the child and where the child should live. Additionally, the court had to establish specific orders regarding the exchange of information between the parents, including educational and medical reports, contact with the child's school and medical practitioners, and notification of significant events in the child's life. The court also considered provisions for the father's ongoing involvement, including communication, gifts, and the child's wishes as they mature.
Berman J ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for the child and that the child live with the mother. The court then detailed a comprehensive set of orders designed to facilitate ongoing communication and information sharing between the parents. These included requirements for the mother to provide the father with school reports, authorise direct contact with the child's school, and notify the father of any serious medical conditions or hospitalisations. Further orders stipulated the provision of regular photographs, notification of the child's address, and authorisation for the father to obtain information from the child's practitioners at his expense. Provisions were also made for the father to send gifts and correspondence, and for the mother to inform the father if the child, upon reaching ten years of age, expressed a desire to communicate or see him. The appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged.
The court was required to determine who should have sole parental responsibility for the child and where the child should live. Additionally, the court had to establish specific orders regarding the exchange of information between the parents, including educational and medical reports, contact with the child's school and medical practitioners, and notification of significant events in the child's life. The court also considered provisions for the father's ongoing involvement, including communication, gifts, and the child's wishes as they mature.
Berman J ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for the child and that the child live with the mother. The court then detailed a comprehensive set of orders designed to facilitate ongoing communication and information sharing between the parents. These included requirements for the mother to provide the father with school reports, authorise direct contact with the child's school, and notify the father of any serious medical conditions or hospitalisations. Further orders stipulated the provision of regular photographs, notification of the child's address, and authorisation for the father to obtain information from the child's practitioners at his expense. Provisions were also made for the father to send gifts and correspondence, and for the mother to inform the father if the child, upon reaching ten years of age, expressed a desire to communicate or see him. The appointment of an Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Banks and Loffler [2018] FamCA 62
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
11
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34
Dennison & Wang
[2010] FamCAFC 182
Loddington & Derringford (No 2)
[2008] FamCA 925