Banaszak and Executors of the Estate of Mr Mandia & Anor
Case
•
[2014] FamCA 398
•16 June 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Banaszak and Executors of the Estate of Mr Mandia & Anor [2014] FamCA 398
[2014] FamCA 398
16 June 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Banaszak and Executors of the Estate of Mr Mandia & Anor*, the applicant, Ms Banaszak, sought orders against the respondents, the Executors of the Estate of Mr Mandia and another party. The nature of the dispute involved an application made on 2 June 2014, the details of which are not specified in the provided text, but which was ultimately dismissed by Cronin J in the Family Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the application filed by Ms Banaszak. While the specific grounds for the application are not detailed, the court was required to consider whether to grant the relief sought by the applicant.
Cronin J dismissed the application. The court also made a certification regarding the reasonableness of engaging counsel for the attendance at the hearing of the application, pursuant to Order 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*. Furthermore, the court ordered that the costs of all parties in relation to this specific application be reserved for determination by the trial judge.
The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the application filed by Ms Banaszak. While the specific grounds for the application are not detailed, the court was required to consider whether to grant the relief sought by the applicant.
Cronin J dismissed the application. The court also made a certification regarding the reasonableness of engaging counsel for the attendance at the hearing of the application, pursuant to Order 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*. Furthermore, the court ordered that the costs of all parties in relation to this specific application be reserved for determination by the trial judge.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Kyriakos & Kyriakos
[2013] FamCAFC 22
Marchant & Marchant
[2012] FamCAFC 181
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52