Bamberg and Cardell

In the matter of Bamberg and Cardell, heard before Judge Harland, the applicant sought interim orders which were ultimately dismissed. The proceedings concerned parenting matters, with the court issuing directions for the final hearing.

The court was required to determine the procedural steps necessary for the final hearing, including the filing of evidence, the provision of case outlines, and arrangements for expert witnesses. A key issue addressed was the application of section 102NA of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), which relates to the cross-examination of parties in cases involving allegations of family violence.

Judge Harland ordered that the respondent apply for funding under the Commonwealth Family Violence and Cross Examination of Parties Scheme, acknowledging the potential impact of section 102NA on unrepresented parties. The court also set strict timelines for the filing of affidavits, requiring parties to rely on specific evidence and limiting the filing of further affidavits without leave. Directions were given for the exchange of case outlines, detailing contentions on issues such as equal parental responsibility, the best interests of the child, and the precise orders sought. The court also reserved costs for the applicant and the Independent Children's Lawyer.