| [2015] FWCA 5832 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Ballinaclough Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1416)
BALLINACLOUGH PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 24 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for approval of the Ballinaclough Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Ballinaclough Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 - 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Ballinaclough Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 August 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415413 PR571135>
- AGLC
- Ballinaclough Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 5832
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5832
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable, and whether they met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it complied with the good faith bargaining requirements. The fairness and reasonableness of the proposed changes, particularly those affecting job security and working conditions, were at the forefront of the arguments presented by both parties.
The Commission, in its decision, carefully reviewed the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement. It considered the evidence presented by both parties and assessed the implications of the changes on the employees. The Commission concluded that, while some of the changes sought by the applicant were reasonable, others were not fair and did not meet the criteria for approval. The Commission found that certain provisions regarding job security and working conditions were overly restrictive and did not provide a fair balance between the interests of the employer and the employees. As a result, the Commission did not approve the agreement in its entirety but instead directed the parties to negotiate further to reach a fair and reasonable agreement.
The Fair Work Commission directed the parties to engage in further negotiations to address the concerns raised and to develop a revised enterprise agreement that meets the legal requirements for approval. The Commission emphasized the importance of achieving a fair and reasonable agreement that balances the interests of both the employer and the employees. The parties were required to report back to the Commission on their progress within a specified timeframe.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.