[2013] FWCA 4181 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ballarat Community Health
(AG2013/6963)
BALLARAT COMMUNITY HEALTH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-2016
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 27 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Ballarat Community Health Mental Health Service Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ballarat Community Health Mental Health Service Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Ballarat Community Health. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2016.
[5] The Australian Nursing Federation and the Health Services Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code AD, AE402051 PR538287>
- AGLC
- Ballarat Community Health [2013] FWCA 4181
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4181
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was made in good faith. The court had to consider whether the agreement met the procedural fairness standards, such as the provision of adequate information and consultation with the employees, and whether it was substantively fair, including the balance of benefits and detriments to the employees.
The court found that the agreement was procedurally fair, as the employer had provided the necessary information and engaged in meaningful consultation with the employees. However, the court identified several substantive fairness issues. Despite these issues, the court concluded that the overall balance of benefits and detriments to the employees was fair, and the agreement was made in good faith. Therefore, the court approved the enterprise agreement.
The final orders of the court mandated that the Ballarat Community Health Mental Health Service Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement would then govern the employment conditions of the mental health services employees within the organisation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.