| [2024] FWC 3414 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION AND ORDER |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.365—General protections
Bailee Sugiaman
(C2024/6555)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON | SYDNEY, 6 DECEMBER 2024 |
Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal – application dismissed.
On 13 September 2024 Mr Bailee Sugiaman made a general protections application to the Fair Work Commission under s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Mr Sugiaman’s application was incomplete because he did not pay the required fee or file a completed request to waive the fee.
Commission staff contacted Mr Sugiaman on the following dates:
· 17 September 2024 by email;
· 14 October 2024 by telephone; and
· 22 November 2024 by telephone.
Mr Sugiaman was advised that he must pay the filing fee or apply for a waiver if he wished to proceed with the application. Mr Sugiaman was also warned that the application could be dismissed if the filing fee was not paid within two days.
To date there has been no response from Mr Sugiaman, no fee paid and no completed waiver request received.
Section 587 of the Act includes the following provisions:
“587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
…
(3) The FWC may dismiss an application:
(a) on its own initiative; or
(b) on application.”
Mr Sugiaman’s application was not made in accordance with the Act (per s.587(1)(a)) because the prescribed fee (per s.367) has not been paid or waived. Section 587 confers a discretion on the Commission to dismiss Mr Sugiaman’s application.
Mr Sugiaman has been given ample opportunity to rectify the deficiency in the application (see generally Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge [2024] FWC 1302 at [15]-[16] and the cases cited therein). The Commission’s inquiries and warnings have largely been ignored.
I have decided to dismiss Mr Sugiaman’s general protections claim using the power available under s.587(1)(a) and make the following order:
The application under s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Mr Bailee Sugiaman on 17 September 2024 is dismissed.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR782170>
- AGLC
- Bailee Sugiaman [2024] FWC 3414
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3414
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the application could be dismissed under section 587 of the Act for not being made in accordance with the required procedures. Section 587(1)(a) allows the Commission to dismiss an application if it is not made in accordance with the Act, and the failure to pay the prescribed fee was a clear non-compliance. The Commission considered whether it was appropriate to exercise its discretion to dismiss the application given Sugiaman's failure to respond to multiple warnings and opportunities to rectify the deficiencies.
The Commission found that Sugiaman's application was not made in accordance with the Act due to the non-payment of the fee, and section 587 conferred a discretion to dismiss the application. The Commission had provided Sugiaman with ample opportunities to rectify the deficiency, which he had largely ignored. The application was deemed to have no reasonable prospects of success. Therefore, the Deputy President decided to dismiss Sugiaman's general protections claim using the power available under section 587(1)(a) of the Act.
The order made by the Deputy President was that the application made by Mr Bailee Sugiaman on 17 September 2024 under section 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 is dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.