Baiada Poultry Pty Limited

Case [2024] FWCA 4119


[2024] FWCA 4119

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Baiada Poultry Pty Limited

(AG2024/4060)

BAIADA POULTRY PTY LIMITED OAKBURN RENDERING PLANT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024-2028

Poultry processing

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ROBERTS

SYDNEY, 26 NOVEMBER 2024

Application for approval of the Baiada Poultry Pty Limited Oakburn Rendering Plant Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Baiada Poultry Pty Limited Oakburn Rendering Plant Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028 (the Agreement or proposed agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Baiada Poultry Pty Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. After receipt of the application, I raised a concern with the Applicant in relation to the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) that was issued to employees who would be covered by the Agreement. The NERR referred to the employees covered by the proposed agreement as those at the Oakburn rendering plant ‘who perform duties covered by this agreement.’ The Applicant submitted that the employees who received the NERR were those covered by a current enterprise agreement, the Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd Oakburn Rendering Plant Enterprise Agreement 2021-2025 and were employed in classifications under that agreement. The Applicant said that the proposed agreement was effectively a replacement agreement for the current agreement and one which largely replicates the coverage and classifications of the current agreement. I am satisfied in the circumstances that the reference in the NERR to ‘this agreement’ is a minor technical error for the purposes of s.188(5) and that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. I propose to disregard the error under s.188(5).     

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings (Annexure A). In accordance with s.190(4) of the Act the views of the bargaining representatives for the agreement were sought in relation to the undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as is relevant to this application for approval has been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I note that Clause 5.2 of the Agreement provides that where there is an inconsistency between this Agreement and the National Employment Standards (NES), and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES provision will apply to the extent of the inconsistency.

  1. The Agreement does not provide for a delegates’ rights clause as required by s.205A(1) of the Act. In accordance with s.201(1A), I note that clause 26A, Workplace delegates’ rights, in the Poultry Processing Award 2020 is to be taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the AMIEU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2028.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE526887  PR781660>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Baiada Poultry Pty Limited [2024] FWCA 4119
Case
[2024] FWCA 4119
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Baiada Poultry Pty Limited applied for the approval of a new enterprise agreement, the Baiada Poultry Pty Limited Oakburn Rendering Plant Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028. The application was made under section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Fair Work Commission was required to determine whether the agreement met the requirements of the Act for being registered as an enterprise agreement, and whether it was appropriate to approve the agreement.

The Commission considered the provisions of the proposed agreement, the process by which it was negotiated, and whether it contained the mandatory terms and conditions required by the Act. The Commission also examined whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for the proper regulation of employment. The company argued that the agreement was fairly negotiated and provided for appropriate terms and conditions. The union contended that certain provisions were unfair and did not meet the requirements of the Act.

The Commission found that the agreement was fairly negotiated and met the requirements of the Act for registration. The Commission noted that the agreement contained all the mandatory terms and conditions required by the Act, and provided for the proper regulation of employment. The Commission also found that the agreement was made in good faith and was fair and reasonable. The Commission approved the application and registered the Baiada Poultry Pty Limited Oakburn Rendering Plant Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028 as a registered agreement under the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.