| [2023] FWCA 984 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Baiada Farms Pty Limited
(AG2023/675)
BAIADA FARMS PTY LIMITED LAVERTON (MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023-2027
| Poultry processing | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 5 APRIL 2023 |
Application for approval of the Baiada Farms Pty Limited Laverton (Maintenance Employees) Enterprise Agreement 2023-2027
Baiada Farms Pty Limited (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Baiada Farms Pty Limited Laverton (Maintenance Employees) Enterprise Agreement 2023-2027 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (the organisation), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the organisation is covered by the Agreement.
The Agreement was approved on 5 April 2023 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 12 April 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE519650 PR760845>
- AGLC
- Baiada Farms Pty Limited [2023] FWCA 984
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 984
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the relevant statutory provisions and whether it met the 'better off overall test'. This test requires that employees be no worse off financially under the new agreement than they would be under their existing conditions. The union argued that several clauses did not meet this test, while the employer contended that the agreement was fair and reasonable.
The Commission reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties. It considered the terms of the agreement, the financial implications for employees, and the broader context of the bargaining process. The Commission found that while some aspects of the agreement required minor adjustments to meet the statutory requirements, the overall agreement did provide a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the statutory framework and the better off overall test.
The final orders of the Commission included approval of the enterprise agreement with specific amendments to address the concerns raised by the union. The agreement was to be certified as meeting all legal requirements, effective from the date of the Commission's decision. This decision provided clarity for both the employer and the employees, ensuring that the terms of the agreement were fair and legally compliant.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.