Babkin and Babkin

In the matter of *Babkin and Babkin*, Hartnett J of the Family Court of Australia considered applications made by the parties. The precise nature of the dispute is not fully detailed in the provided text, but it involved orders concerning children, including their placement on an Airport Watch List.

The court was required to determine the final disposition of the parties' applications and to consider the question of costs. Additionally, the court was to give effect to a Minute of Consent Orders agreed between the parties, which were to remain on the Court file.

Hartnett J made orders that all extant applications be dismissed, with the exception of the determination of costs. The court directed that the Minute of Consent Orders, marked as Exhibit A, be retained on the Court file. The court also noted that particulars of obligations and consequences of contravention of the orders were set out in an annexure, pursuant to sections 62B and 65DA(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The mother was granted liberty to apply to remove the children's names from the Airport Watch List if necessary. The Applicant and the Independent Children’s Lawyer were directed to file submissions regarding costs within 21 days, with the court to determine costs on the papers.