AXP v Queensland Police Service
Case
•
[2013] QCAT 680
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
AXP v Queensland Police Service [2013] QCAT 680
[2013] QCAT 680
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AXP, a member of the Queensland Police Service (QPS), lodged a complaint with the Information Commissioner alleging that QPS had breached information privacy principles by disclosing his personal information to a journalist. The complaint was referred to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) which had jurisdiction to hear the matter. The Tribunal was required to decide whether the complaint was substantiated and if so whether QPS was liable for the breach. The Tribunal held that the complaint had not been substantiated. It found that the personal information in question was contained in an Executive Briefing Note (EBN) which had been prepared and distributed within QPS. The Tribunal found that the information in the EBN arose from a complaint under the Police Service Administration Act 1990 (Qld) and as such the privacy principles did not apply to the information. Even if they had applied the Tribunal found that the QPS had not breached the privacy principles. Although a member or members of the QPS had disclosed personal information to the journalist, the information had not been protected by reasonable safeguards and as such the QPS had breached privacy principle 4. However, a breach of privacy principle 4 did not automatically result in a breach of privacy principle 11 and there was no evidence that the QPS was liable for the disclosure.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Privacy Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice & Procedural Fairness
-
Unjust Enrichment
-
Res Judicata
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Zil v Queensland Police Service [2019] QCAT 79
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Queensland Police Service v Zil
[2019] QCATA 162
Flori v Queensland Police Service
[2015] QCATA 191
AXP v Queensland Police Service
[2015] QCATA 177
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34
Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34
Director General, Department of Education and Training v MT
[2006] NSWCA 270