| [2014] FWCA 7149 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Axedale Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Shaws Cartage Contractors
(AG2014/9220)
SHAWS CARTAGE CONTRACTORS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2017
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER CARGILL | SYDNEY, 10 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Shaws Cartage Contractors Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Shaws Cartage Contractors Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Axedale Holdings Pty Ltd trading as Shaws Cartage Contractors. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was not lodged within 14 days after it was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application to 2 October 2014.
[3] The Agreement does contain a consultation term, however, it is not a consultation term that fully complies with s205 of the Act. Consequently the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 17 October 2014. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE410581 PR556446>
- AGLC
- Axedale Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Shaws Cartage Contractors [2014] FWCA 7149
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7149
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues at hand required the Commission to consider whether the agreement met the criteria for procedural and substantive fairness. Procedurally, the Commission examined if the agreement had been genuinely negotiated, and if the necessary consultation and disclosure obligations were fulfilled. Substantively, the Commission assessed whether the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account the principles of enterprise bargaining set out in the Act.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that there was sufficient evidence of consultation and disclosure. The terms of the agreement were considered to be fair and reasonable, as they balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for appropriate wage increases and included provisions for working conditions that were in line with industry standards. The Commission approved the agreement, recognising its compliance with the statutory requirements and its alignment with the principles of enterprise bargaining.
The final orders of the Commission were that the Shaws Cartage Contractors Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 be approved, with the effective date of the agreement being backdated to the commencement date of the previous agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.