AWJ Civil Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWCA 7530


[2016] FWCA 7530
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

AWJ Civil Pty Ltd
(AG2016/5613)

AWJ CIVIL PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2020

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 19 OCTOBER 2016

Application for approval of the AWJ Civil Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AWJ Civil Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by AWJ Civil Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 October 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 18 October 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE421775  PR586595>

Details
AGLC
AWJ Civil Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 7530
Case
[2016] FWCA 7530
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AWJ Civil Pty Ltd recently applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of an enterprise agreement with its employees. The agreement, covering the period from 2016 to 2020, was contested by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The dispute came before the Fair Work Commission, which was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement was a "better off overall test" (BOOT) agreement. This requires that the proposed agreement provides employees with at least the same terms and conditions as they would have under the applicable award or modern award, and that it provides them with improved terms and conditions overall. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement met the requirements for "single interest" and "no disadvantage" agreements.

In delivering its decision, the Commission noted that the agreement provided for wage increases and other benefits for employees, which met the BOOT. It found that the agreement was a single interest agreement, as it was made by a single employer with a single group of employees. The Commission also concluded that the agreement did not disadvantage any employee in comparison to their award entitlements. As a result, the Commission approved the agreement, finding that it met all the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act.

The Commission's decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide improved terms and conditions for employees, while also meeting the legal requirements for approval. Employers and unions must carefully consider the terms of any proposed agreement to ensure that it is likely to be approved by the Commission.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.