“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)-Victorian Branch v CSF Proteins Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWC 7555


[2014] FWC 7555
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)-Victorian Branch
v
CSF Proteins Pty Ltd
(B2014/1502)

COMMISSIONER RYAN

MELBOURNE, 23 OCTOBER 2014

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of CSF Proteins Pty Limited.

[1] This is an application pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (theAct) by “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) for a protected action ballot order in relation to employees of CSF Proteins Pty Ltd (the Respondent). The application was made on 21 October 2014.

[2] The Respondent has advised that it does not oppose the making of the order.

[3] Section 443(1) of the Act states:

443 When the FWC must make a protected action ballot order

    (1) The FWC must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:

      (a) an application has been made under section 437; and

      (b) the FWC is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.

[4] The AMWU has demonstrated that it has met the requirements of s.443(1) of the Act in a Statutory Declaration declared by Barry Terzic, an Official of the AMWU.

[5] I am satisfied that the requirements of s.443(1) of the Act have been met and that, accordingly, the Order must be made. I will issue an Order based on the draft order provided by the AMWU.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR556993>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)-Victorian Branch v CSF Proteins Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 7555
Case
[2014] FWC 7555
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)-Victorian Branch sought an injunction against CSF Proteins Pty Ltd to prevent the company from proceeding with a proposed ballot of its employees. The ballot was intended to seek approval for potential industrial action. The dispute was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The union argued that the ballot was unlawful as it did not comply with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the ballot conducted by CSF Proteins Pty Ltd complied with the legislative requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the ballot was properly conducted in accordance with the provisions governing protected industrial action. The union contended that the ballot did not include all the necessary information required by the Act, rendering it invalid. Conversely, CSF Proteins Pty Ltd argued that the ballot met the statutory requirements and was therefore lawful.

The court found that the ballot did not include all the necessary information required by the Act, making it invalid. The decision hinged on the precise wording and interpretation of the statutory provisions. The court held that the omission of certain information from the ballot meant it did not comply with the legal standards set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. Consequently, the court granted the injunction sought by the union, preventing CSF Proteins Pty Ltd from proceeding with the ballot.

In light of the court's determination, it ordered CSF Proteins Pty Ltd to cease the proposed ballot and to take appropriate steps to remedy the deficiencies identified. The union's request for an injunction was thus upheld, and the company was enjoined from proceeding with the ballot in its current form.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.