| [2024] FWC 896 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd T/A Wilmar Sugar
(B2024/413)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 9 APRIL 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd (Wilmar or Employer).
I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), and The Australian Workers Union (AWU) have each also made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]
On 5 April 2024, the Commission was advised that Wilmar did not, in effect, object to the Application as amended to reflect certain accommodations reached between the parties.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Nicole Jane Frisken, Regional Organiser, AMWU LD/NT Branch, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Wilmar, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[2] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
Pursuant to section 443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in section 414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified four (4) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of industrial action taken by employees arising from questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. The standard three working day minimum notice period will apply to all other questions.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 26 April 2024.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
The Order issued by the Commission empowers CiVS as the ballot agent to determine the commencement date of the ballot in accordance with s.451(2)(a) of the Act and the standard practice for such matters.
The sequence of clauses in the draft order provided by the parties has been altered to adopt the Commission’s standard drafting approach.
The Order issued by the Commission empowers CiVS as the ballot agent to determine the commencement date of the ballot in accordance with s.451(2)(a) of the Act and the standard practice for such matters.
An Order has been separately issued in PR773273.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters (B2024/411, and B2024/412). To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, the Commission will also issue the Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2024/411 and B2024/412.
[2] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400.
[3] This is, in effect, twelve (12) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR773274>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd T/A Wilmar Sugar [2024] FWC 896
- Case
- [2024] FWC 896
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the AMWU had satisfied the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 for conducting a protected action ballot and whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying a longer notice period than the statutory minimum. The court considered the declarations and submissions from the AMWU and the lack of objection from Wilmar Sugar in making its decision. It was also required to determine the closing date for the ballot and the commencement date for the ballot.
The Deputy President of the Fair Work Commission was satisfied that the AMWU had met the requirements of the Act for conducting a protected action ballot and that there were exceptional circumstances justifying a longer notice period than the statutory minimum. The Commission decided that the ballot would be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS, which had been approved as a ballot agent. The minimum period of written notice was set at four working days for certain questions and three working days for all other questions. The ballot period was set to close on 26 April 2024. The commencement date of the ballot was to be determined by the ballot agent in accordance with standard practice.
The Fair Work Commission issued an Order under section 443(5) of the Act, allowing the protected action ballot to proceed. The Order specified the minimum notice period and closing date for the ballot, and it empowered the ballot agent to determine the commencement date. The Commission also scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted with other related matters and directed the parties to attend ready for meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.