| [2022] FWC 1773 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Weir Minerals Australia Ltd
(B2022/656)
| VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | SYDNEY, 8 JULY 2022 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Weir Minerals Australia Ltd
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Weir Minerals Australia Ltd (Respondent).
On 8 July 2022, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Tim Ferguson of the Applicant declared on 6 July 2022, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An Order has been separately issued in PR743572.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR743573>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Weir Minerals Australia Ltd [2022] FWC 1773
- Case
- [2022] FWC 1773
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the FWC was whether the AMWU had satisfied the requirements for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Act. The AMWU needed to demonstrate that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that it had genuinely been trying to reach agreement with WMA. The FWC considered the material before it, including the statutory declaration of Tim Ferguson of the AMWU, which outlined the steps taken by the union in bargaining with WMA.
The FWC was satisfied that the AMWU had met the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act, as it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with WMA. The FWC also determined that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement. Consequently, the FWC decided to grant the AMWU's application for a protected action ballot order.
The Fair Work Commission issued an order granting the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union's application for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Weir Minerals Australia Ltd. The order was issued under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and was effective from the date of the decision. The AMWU was now authorised to conduct a ballot of its members, who were employees of WMA, regarding potential protected action.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.