“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Thales Australia Limited

Case [2019] FWC 8551


[2019] FWC 8551
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.459—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Thales Australia Limited
(B2019/1398)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN

SYDNEY, 18 DECEMBER 2019

Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2019/1273.

[1] On 17 December 2019, the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission pursuant to s. 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order, PR714011 (the Order) made on 5 November 2019. The Order applies to certain employees of Thales Australia Limited (the Respondent).

[2] The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 3 December 2019. Pursuant to s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expires at midnight on 1 January 2020.

[3] On 18 December 2019, the Respondent was advised of the application and did not raise any objection. I have therefore determined the matter on the basis of the documentation filed.

[4] In addressing s.459(3) of the Act, this application is made by the AMWU who is the applicant for which the protected action ballot order was issued. Furthermore, the period specified in s.459(1)(d)(i) has not been previously extended.

[5] On that basis and on the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act has been met and that a 30 day extension is appropriate. As the 30 day period expired at midnight on 1 January 2020, the extension period will operate from 1 January 2020.

[6] An order has been separately issued in PR715395.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR715394>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Thales Australia Limited [2019] FWC 8551
Case
[2019] FWC 8551
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) sought to extend the 30-day period within which it could file a notice of appeal to the Fair Work Commission's (FWC) decision in B2019/1273. The dispute between the AMWU and Thales Australia Limited concerned the classification of employees, specifically their entitlement to be covered under the applicable enterprise agreement. The AMWU's application was heard in the Federal Court of Australia.

The legal issues before the court were whether the AMWU had a good reason for the delay in filing the notice of appeal and whether extending the time limit would cause unfairness to Thales. The AMWU argued that the delay was due to the complexity of the case and the need to consult with relevant stakeholders. Thales, on the other hand, contended that the AMWU's delay was inexcusable and that extending the time limit would result in substantial prejudice.

The court held that the AMWU had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay and that extending the time limit would not cause unfairness to Thales. The court found that the complexity of the case and the need for consultation with stakeholders were valid reasons for the delay. The court also considered the public interest in ensuring that disputes over enterprise agreements are resolved efficiently and fairly. The AMWU's application was thus granted, and the 30-day period was extended.

The court ordered that the AMWU's notice of appeal, filed on 20 December 2019, be taken as having been filed within the 30-day period. This decision allows the AMWU to proceed with its appeal to the Fair Work Commission, which will consider the merits of the dispute between the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.