"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 2108


[2025] FWC 2108

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd

(B2025/1158)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 21 JULY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd (Schindler Lifts or Employer). 

  1. I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) have made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. On 18 July 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application. 

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Steven Isberg, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Schindler Lifts, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot. 

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 5 August 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR789835.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, that Member will issue an Order requiring their attendance in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1107.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR789836>

Details
AGLC
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2108
Case
[2025] FWC 2108
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU), applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Schindler Lifts Australia Pty Ltd. The AMWU sought to conduct a ballot as part of its negotiations for an enterprise agreement with the employer. Schindler Lifts did not object to the application, and the Commission decided to proceed without a hearing.

The central legal issue was whether the AMWU had met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 to hold a ballot for protected action. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if there was a notification time for the proposed agreement and if the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer. The union's application was supported by a declaration from an organiser detailing the bargaining process and the union's efforts to negotiate.

In granting the application, Deputy President Hampton found that the AMWU had satisfied all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act. The evidence, including the declaration, demonstrated that the union had genuinely attempted to negotiate and that there was a notification time for the proposed agreement. The Deputy President also set the closing date for the ballot as 5 August 2025, effectively 10 working days from the order date, in line with the union's request. The decision established the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act and indicated that another member of the Commission would conduct the compulsory conciliation conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.