“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWC 2533


[2022] FWC 2533

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v

Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd

(B2022/1403)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

SYDNEY, 20 SEPTEMBER 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent).

  1. On 20 September 2022, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Timothy Jackson of the Applicant declared on 16 September 2022, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR746071.


VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR746072>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 2533
Case
[2022] FWC 2533
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd. The AMWU sought to conduct a ballot for protected action in relation to a proposed agreement. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd did not oppose the application. The Vice President of the Fair Work Commission, Catanzariti, decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The legal issue the court had to decide was whether the AMWU had met the requirements to conduct a protected action ballot under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved determining whether the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd and whether a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had been given. The court assessed the material before it, including the statutory declaration of Timothy Jackson of the AMWU, which outlined the steps taken in bargaining with Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd.

The Vice President was satisfied that the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach agreement with Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia Pty Ltd and that a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had been given. The Vice President found that the requirements in section 443(1) of the Act had been met. Consequently, the court decided to grant the AMWU's application for a protected action ballot order. An order was separately issued in PR746071.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.