"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 1676


[2025] FWC 1676

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v

Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd

(B2025/935)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 17 JUNE 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd (PIM or Employer).

  1. I note that the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU)[1]  has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 16 June 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. I observe that the application provided in this matter contained certain observations about the AMWU’s preference in relation to the date and time the ballot is to open, and updating and finalisation of the list of voters. One aspect of these was not in a form suitable for inclusion in the Order and may have contradicted some of the other proposed provisions. In that light, I have issued the Order using the Commission’s standard approach, noting that this is also consistent with the role to be played by the Act and associated regulations on the conduct of the ballot. I also observe that the Ballot Agent may have regard to the proposals set out in the application to the extent that they are consistent with the Order and the proper conduct of a ballot of this kind.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Stephen Fodrocy, Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with PIM, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 1 July 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR788274.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/940.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788275>

Details
AGLC
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1676
Case
[2025] FWC 1676
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union", known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU), applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order against Programmed Industrial Maintenance Pty Ltd (PIM) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The AMWU sought to organise a ballot among certain employees of PIM regarding a proposed enterprise agreement. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) made a separate application for a ballot concerning the same proposed agreement. The Commission noted that PIM did not object to the AMWU's application.

The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with PIM and whether all the statutory requirements for the ballot had been met. The AMWU argued that it had followed the necessary bargaining process and was genuinely trying to reach an agreement with PIM. The Commission examined the application and supporting documentation, including a declaration by Stephen Fodrocy, an Industrial Officer of the AMWU, outlining the steps taken in the bargaining process.

The Deputy President concluded that the AMWU had fulfilled all the statutory requirements for the ballot, including demonstrating a genuine attempt to reach an agreement with PIM. The Commission issued an Order permitting the AMWU to conduct the ballot through Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, which had been approved as a ballot agent. The voting period was set to close on 1 July 2025, establishing the ballot period for compulsory conciliation purposes. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the conciliation conference, where both the AMWU and CFMEU will be required to attend.

This decision highlights the importance of ensuring that unions genuinely attempt to reach agreements through bargaining before proceeding with a ballot for protected industrial action. The Fair Work Commission's role in overseeing the ballot process ensures that the rights of both employers and employees are protected within the framework of the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.