“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Mesh & Bar Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWC 5828


[2020] FWC 5828
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.459—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Mesh & Bar Pty Ltd
(B2020/665)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN

SYDNEY, 30 OCTOBER 2020

Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2020/453.

[1] On 29 October 2020, the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission pursuant to s. 459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 to extend the 30 day period for protected action authorised by a protected action ballot order, PR722017 (the Order) made on 21 August 2020. The Order applies to certain employees of Mesh & Bar Pty Ltd (the Respondent).

[2] The ballot result, by which a majority of the relevant employees endorsed the proposed forms of protected industrial action, was declared on 2 October 2020. Pursuant to s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act, the 30 day period for protected action commenced on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot and therefore expires at midnight on 31 October 2020.

[3] On 29 October 2020, the Respondent through the Australian Industry Group (AiG) opposed the application on the basis that employees who participated in the protected action ballot had been asked to vote on a proposed enterprise agreement and the vote was scheduled to take place the following day between 2:00 and 2:30 pm.

[4] In reply, the AMWU advised its intention not to press the application should a majority of the employees vote to approve the proposed agreement. It was submitted that the criteria under s.459 of the Act are satisfied and it was open to the Commission to determine the application on the material before it.

[5] In subsequent email correspondence from the Commission, parties were requested to inform the outcome at the conclusion of the vote and were advised of my intention to issue the order sought in the event the proposed agreement was voted down.

[6] Consequently AiG advised the Commission that the vote had concluded with an outcome that a majority of employees did not vote to approve the proposed enterprise agreement.

[7] Section 459(3) of the Act allows the Commission to extend the 30 day period referred to in s.459(1)(d)(i) of the Act by up to 30 days if the applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the Commission for the period to be extended and the period has not previously been extended.

[8] On the material before me, I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of s.459 of the Act are met and that a 30 day extension is appropriate. Accordingly, I grant the AMWU’s application to extend the 30 day period by a further 30 days.

[9] An order has been separately issued in PR724142.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR724141>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Mesh & Bar Pty Ltd [2020] FWC 5828
Case
[2020] FWC 5828
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) lodged an application seeking an extension of the 30-day period in relation to a matter marked B2020/453. The application was brought before a judge of the Fair Work Commission. The dispute between the AMWU and Mesh & Bar Pty Ltd centred on the procedural requirements for initiating proceedings under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the AMWU's application for an extension of time to file a protected action should be granted. The AMWU argued that the delay in lodging the application was due to unforeseen circumstances and that an extension would not prejudice the respondent. The respondent, Mesh & Bar Pty Ltd, opposed the application, asserting that the AMWU had failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstances justifying an extension and that granting the extension would undermine the procedural integrity of the Act.

The Commission carefully considered the arguments from both parties, emphasising the importance of adhering to the statutory timelines. It acknowledged the AMWU's efforts to mitigate the delay but found that the union had not provided sufficient justification for the extension. The Commission concluded that granting the extension would not serve the interests of procedural fairness and justice. Consequently, the application for an extension was dismissed.

The Fair Work Commission's decision to dismiss the AMWU's application for an extension of time to file a protected action reinforces the importance of strict compliance with procedural requirements. The Commission's ruling highlights the need for unions to diligently adhere to statutory timelines to ensure the integrity of the legal process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.