| [2025] FWC 1036 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd
(B2025/624)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 14 APRIL 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd
This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd (Linde or Employer).
On 11 April 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Stephen Isberg, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Linde, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 1 May 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR786058.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is in effect 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR786059>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1036
- Case
- [2025] FWC 1036
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the AMWU had satisfied the requirements under s.437 of the Fair Work Act to hold a ballot and whether the Commission should set a closing date for the ballot. The AMWU had to demonstrate it had engaged in genuine bargaining and met the notification period requirement. The Commission also needed to determine an appropriate closing date for the ballot.
The Deputy President was satisfied, based on the evidence, that the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Linde. The notification period requirement was also met. The Deputy President set 1 May 2025 as the closing date for the ballot, which was 10 working days from the making of the order and aligned with the AMWU's request. The ballot was to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent. The matter would be referred for a compulsory conciliation conference to facilitate further negotiations between the parties.
The Fair Work Commission granted the AMWU's application for a protected action ballot order. It set 1 May 2025 as the closing date for the ballot, to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd. The matter will proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference to encourage further negotiations between the AMWU and Linde.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.