| [2024] FWC 1086 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
JBS Australia Pty Ltd
(B2024/483)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 26 APRIL 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of JBS Australia Pty Ltd
This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of JBS Australia Pty Ltd (JBS or Employer).
On 24 April 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Tim Ferguson, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with JBS, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act[1] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 10 May 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR774242.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] [2023] FWC 1400.
[2] This is, in effect, ten (10) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR774244>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v JBS Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1086
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1086
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the Commission had to resolve was whether the AMWU had fulfilled the conditions required for a protected action ballot under section 443 of the Fair Work Act. This included verifying that the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with JBS and that all procedural requirements were met. Additionally, the Commission needed to confirm that the proposed ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), was eligible to conduct the ballot under section 468A of the Act.
The Deputy President Hampton concluded that all requirements for a protected action ballot had been satisfied. The AMWU's declaration by Tim Ferguson demonstrated the union's good faith efforts in bargaining and its ongoing attempts to reach an agreement with JBS. Furthermore, CiVS was approved as a ballot agent, authorised to conduct the ballot. The Deputy President set the closing date for voting at 10 May 2024, ensuring that the ballot period was within the legal timeframe.
The Fair Work Commission issued an order granting the AMWU's application for a protected action ballot. The ballot is to be conducted by CiVS, with voting to conclude on 10 May 2024. Additionally, a separate order was issued to initiate compulsory conciliation under section 448A of the Act, requiring all bargaining representatives to attend a conference aimed at facilitating meaningful negotiations. This decision ensures that the dispute over the enterprise agreement can proceed through the legally mandated processes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.