| [2022] FWC 2381 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited
(B2022/1342)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 8 SEPTEMBER 2022 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited.
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited (Respondent).
The Respondent was given multiple opportunities to comment on the application but chose not to do so.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Andrew Bonello of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An order has been separately issued in PR745607.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR745592>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited [2022] FWC 2381
- Case
- [2022] FWC 2381
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the AMWU met the requirements to conduct a protected action ballot. This involved determining if there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and whether the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Inghams Enterprises. The AMWU submitted a declaration from Mr Andrew Bonello stating that they had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the respondent.
The Deputy President was satisfied that the AMWU had met the requirements for a protected action ballot. The court found that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Inghams Enterprises. As a result, the application for a protected action ballot order was granted.
An order was issued separately in PR745607, allowing the AMWU to proceed with the ballot for protected action in relation to the employees of Inghams Enterprises.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.