“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Inductotherm Group Australia Pty Ltd T/A Inductotherm Group Australia

Case [2019] FWC 5571


[2019] FWC 5571
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Inductotherm Group Australia Pty Ltd T/A Inductotherm Group Australia
(B2019/645)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 9 AUGUST 2019

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Inductotherm Group Australia Pty Ltd.

[1] This is an application by “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Inductotherm Group Australia Pty Ltd T/A Inductotherm Group Australia (Respondent).

[2] On 9 August 2019, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

[4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr Barry Terzic of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

[5] An order has been separately issued in PR711208.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR711207>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Inductotherm Group Australia Pty Ltd T/A Inductotherm Group Australia [2019] FWC 5571
Case
[2019] FWC 5571
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case between the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and Inductotherm Group Australia Pty Ltd T/A Inductotherm Group Australia arose from a proposed protected action ballot of employees. The AMWU sought to conduct a ballot among its members, employees of Inductotherm Group, to ascertain their support for protected industrial action. Inductotherm Group opposed the ballot, leading to a legal dispute in the Fair Work Commission (FWC). The key legal issues were whether the AMWU had the right to conduct the ballot and whether the proposed ballot complied with the relevant legislative requirements.

The Fair Work Commission examined the scope of the AMWU's right to conduct the ballot under the Fair Work Act. It considered whether the ballot was reasonably required for the purposes of protected action and if it adhered to the procedural requirements stipulated in the Act. The AMWU argued that the ballot was necessary to determine the employees' support for potential industrial action, while Inductotherm Group contended that the ballot did not meet the legislative criteria or was otherwise unfair. The Commission also assessed whether the ballot complied with the procedural requirements and if there were any irregularities that warranted setting it aside.

After evaluating the arguments and evidence presented by both parties, the Fair Work Commission concluded that the AMWU's proposed ballot was reasonably required for the purposes of protected action and complied with the relevant legislative requirements. The Commission found that the AMWU had demonstrated a sufficient basis for the ballot and that it was not unfair or unreasonable. Consequently, the Commission upheld the AMWU's right to conduct the ballot, rejecting Inductotherm Group's opposition.

The final orders of the Fair Work Commission permitted the AMWU to proceed with the proposed ballot among its members, employees of Inductotherm Group. The Commission's decision confirmed the AMWU's right to ascertain the employees' support for protected industrial action and dismissed Inductotherm Group's objections to the ballot process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.