| [2024] FWC 3098 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
GH Varley Pty Ltd
(B2024/1445)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT | SYDNEY, 8 NOVEMBER 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of GH Varley Pty Ltd
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of GH Varley Pty Ltd (GHV or Employer).
On 8 November 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Nathan Clements, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with GHV, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 22 November 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR781092.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR781093>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v GH Varley Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 3098
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3098
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the AMWU had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement with GHV and if all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act were met. The AMWU provided a declaration from Nathan Clements, an Organiser, outlining the steps taken in bargaining with GHV and affirming the union's genuine efforts to reach an agreement. The court needed to verify these assertions and confirm that the notification time for the proposed agreement was met.
After reviewing the materials, the Deputy President concluded that the AMWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with GHV, and all the requirements of section 443(1) were fulfilled. The court authorised the ballot to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under section 468A of the Fair Work Act. The voting period was set to close on 22 November 2024, which was 10 working days from the date of the order, aligning with the period requested in the application.
An Order was issued, and the matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A. This Member would require the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement and likely issue directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.