"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Gale Pacific Limited

Case [2025] FWC 1407


[2025] FWC 1407

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v

Gale Pacific Limited

(B2025/814)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 22 MAY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Gale Pacific Limited 

  1. This is an application by the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Gale Pacific Limited (Gale or Employer).

  1. I note that the United Workers Union (UWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 21 May 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Stephen Fodrocy, Industrial Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Gale, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 5 June 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I note that the application provided in this matter contained certain observations about the AMWU’s preference in relation to the updating and finalisation of the list of voters. These were not in a form suitable for inclusion in the Order and contradicted some of the other proposed provisions. In that light, I have issued the Order using the Commission’s standard approach, noting that this is also consistent with the related matter and the role to be played by the Act and associated regulations in the conduct of the ballot. I also observe that the Ballot Agent may have regard to the proposals set out in the application to the extent that they are consistent with the Order and the proper conduct of a ballot of this kind.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR787539.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/804.

[2] This is, in effect 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application. This period will also enable the s.448A conference for the two related matters to be conducted together.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

< PR787540>

Details
AGLC
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Gale Pacific Limited [2025] FWC 1407
Case
[2025] FWC 1407
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) sought a protected action ballot order under the Fair Work Act 2009 from the Fair Work Commission in relation to certain employees of Gale Pacific Limited. The application was made under section 437 of the Act, seeking authorisation for a ballot to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, an approved agent under section 468A. The United Workers Union also applied for a ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement, but this application is distinct from the AMWU's proceedings.

The court had to determine whether the AMWU had met all requirements to conduct a protected action ballot, including proving that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer and that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement. The court needed to ensure that all procedural requirements under sections 443 and 448A of the Act were satisfied. The court also had to decide on the appropriate closing date for the ballot and whether the proposed list of voters adhered to the Act and regulations.

The Deputy President concluded that the AMWU had satisfied all the requirements for a protected action ballot. The AMWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Gale Pacific Limited, and the notification time for the proposed agreement was confirmed. The Deputy President noted that Gale Pacific Limited did not object to the application. Consequently, the court issued an order allowing the ballot to proceed, specifying the closing date for voting as 5 June 2025. The order also adopted the Commission's standard approach to the list of voters, noting that the ballot agent could consider the AMWU's proposals to the extent they aligned with the order and the proper conduct of the ballot. The court separately assigned the matter to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act, along with related matters.

The final order authorised the AMWU to conduct a ballot for protected action, specifying the closing date for voting as 5 June 2025. This order aligned with the standard approach for the list of voters and ensured the ballot was conducted in accordance with the Act and associated regulations. The conciliation conference for the related matters was to be conducted by another Member of the Commission, who would also issue directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.