“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWC 3219


[2022] FWC 3219

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v

DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd

(B2022/1794)

VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI

MELBOURNE, 6 DECEMBER 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd (Respondent).

  1. On 5 December 2022, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Philip Andrew Golby of the Applicant declared on 2 December 2022, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR748644.


VICE PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR748645>

Details
AGLC
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 3219
Case
[2022] FWC 3219
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) filed an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 seeking a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd. The union aimed to conduct a ballot of its members to authorise industrial action, such as strikes or lockouts, in the context of ongoing negotiations with the respondent. The Fair Work Commission was informed that DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd did not oppose the application. The Vice President Catanzariti proceeded to determine the matter without a hearing, relying on the documentation provided, including a statutory declaration from the union affirming their efforts to reach an agreement with the employer.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the AMWU had met the statutory requirements for conducting a protected action ballot. This included verifying that the union had genuinely attempted to negotiate with the employer and that the requisite notification period for the proposed industrial action had been observed, as mandated by section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009.

After reviewing the evidence, Vice President Catanzariti concluded that the AMWU had indeed satisfied the conditions set forth in the Act. The union's declaration, along with other submissions, demonstrated their good faith efforts in bargaining with DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd. Furthermore, the statutory notification period had been adhered to, thus fulfilling the prerequisites for the ballot. Consequently, the application was approved, and an order was issued permitting the union to proceed with the ballot for protected industrial action.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order in PR748644, granting the AMWU permission to conduct a protected action ballot among its members employed by DMH Plant Services Pty Ltd. This decision underscored the importance of procedural compliance and the necessity for both parties to engage in genuine bargaining efforts before resorting to industrial action.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.