| [2023] FWC 950 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Curragh Queensland Mining Pty Ltd
(B2023/357)
| VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | SYDNEY, 21 APRIL 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Curragh Queensland Mining Pty Ltd
This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Curragh Queensland Mining Pty Ltd (Respondent).
On 19 April 2023, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent did not oppose the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Glenn Desmond Sam of the Applicant declared on 17 April 2023, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An Order has been separately issued in PR761278.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR761279>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Curragh Queensland Mining Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 950
- Case
- [2023] FWC 950
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the AMWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Curragh Queensland Mining Pty Ltd and whether the notification requirements stipulated in section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been fulfilled. The AMWU asserted that it had taken all necessary steps in bargaining and had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the Respondent. The evidence provided included a statutory declaration from Glenn Desmond Sam of the AMWU, affirming the union's efforts in bargaining.
The Vice President, after reviewing the material before the court, found that the union had indeed taken all necessary steps and was genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the employer. Furthermore, the Vice President was satisfied that the notification time for the proposed agreement was appropriate and that all statutory requirements had been met. Consequently, the Vice President determined that an Order for a protected action ballot was appropriate.
An Order was subsequently issued in PR761278, permitting the AMWU to proceed with the protected action ballot as requested. This decision underscored the importance of adherence to the Fair Work Act's provisions regarding protected action and the need for genuine bargaining efforts by unions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.