| [2020] FWC 3852 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
Boral Cement Limited
(B2020/388)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 22 JULY 2020 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Boral Cement Limited.
[1] This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Boral Cement Limited (Respondent).
[2] On 22 July 2020, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.
[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
[4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr B Terzic of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
[5] An order has been separately issued in PR721201.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR721200>
- AGLC
- “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Boral Cement Limited [2020] FWC 3852
- Case
- [2020] FWC 3852
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the commission involved the procedural correctness and compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections related to the protection of employees' rights and the obligations of unions in organising and conducting ballots. The commission had to determine whether the AMWU had followed the requisite steps and adhered to the legislative requirements when proposing the ballot.
The commission concluded that the AMWU had fulfilled its obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009. It was found that the union had properly notified Boral and provided sufficient detail regarding the ballot's purpose and procedures. The commission also determined that the proposed ballot was not likely to result in any undue hardship to Boral or its employees. As such, the commission approved the AMWU's application for the ballot to proceed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.