| [2024] FWC 1811 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd
(B2024/864)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT | SYDNEY, 10 JULY 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd
This is an application by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd (Ausgrid or Employer). It is related to matter B2024/804.
On 9 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Tim Ferguson, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with it, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
I am satisfied on the basis of the material filed by Ausgrid that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of 4 working days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 31 July 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR776879.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 15 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR776878>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Ausgrid Management Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1811
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1811
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the declaration by Tim Ferguson, the Organiser for AMWU, which detailed the union's efforts to negotiate with Ausgrid. The declaration confirmed that the union had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement. The Commission was satisfied that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were met, including the notification period for the proposed agreement. Furthermore, the Commission accepted that exceptional circumstances justified an extended written notice period for the industrial action as per section 443(5) of the Act. This extended period was set at four working days for specific items outlined in Clause 5 of the Order.
The Deputy President, Wright, ruled that the ballot would be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), which was approved under section 468A of the Act as a ballot agent. The voting for the ballot was set to close on 31 July 2024, establishing the ballot period under section 448A(2) of the Act. The decision also mandated a compulsory conciliation conference for meaningful negotiations and assigned another member of the Commission to oversee the conference. This matter was to be separately issued in PR776879.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.