| [2025] FWC 2644 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd
(B2025/1393)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 8 SEPTEMBER 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd
This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd (Aurizon or Employer).
I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Australian Rail Tram & Bus Industry Union (RTBU)[1] have each made a separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
I also observe that the AMWU has provided an amended draft order and some other material seeking to clarify the identity of the employer and to correct some errors in the proposed ballot questions. On 5 September 2025, the Employer advised that it did not object to the (amended) application subject to confirmation of there being an extended notice period of five (5) working days in relation to seven of the proposed forms of industrial action. The AMWU in effect, accepted that there were the relevant exceptional circumstances and agreed to that amendment.
In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application to generally reflect the draft order and determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Darren Travis, State Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Aurizon, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 19 September 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
Pursuant to s.443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in s.414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified five (5) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the nominated ballot questions (1, 5, 9, 17, 18, 19 and 20) in clause 5 of the Order.
An Order has been separately issued in PR791496.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2025/1399 and B2025/1402 respectively.
[2] This was the specific date sought in the application and is consistent with the related matters.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR791497>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2644
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2644
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue for the court was whether the AMWU had fulfilled the conditions under the Fair Work Act for a protected action ballot, including demonstrating that there had been genuine efforts to reach an agreement with the employer. Additionally, the court had to determine if the proposed industrial action met the criteria for an extended notice period, as agreed upon by the AMWU and Aurizon Bulk Central Pty Ltd.
The Deputy President of the Fair Work Commission, Hampton, concluded that the AMWU had satisfied the requirements for a protected action ballot. The AMWU's efforts to reach an agreement were deemed genuine, and the conditions of section 443 of the Act were met. The court granted leave to amend the application to reflect the draft order and accepted the proposed five-day notice period for certain forms of industrial action. The court further determined that the ballot would be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, an approved agent. The closing date for voting was set at 19 September 2025. The matter was then assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference.
This decision grants the AMWU's application for a protected action ballot order, setting the parameters for the ballot and the conciliation conference. The outcome ensures that the industrial action process adheres to the legal requirements and that all parties are prepared for further negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.