| [2022] FWC 2173 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
ARA Electrical Engineering Services Pty Ltd
(B2022/1218)
| VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | SYDNEY, 16 AUGUST 2022 |
Proposed protected action ballot by employees of ARA Electrical Engineering Services Pty Ltd
This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of ARA Electrical Engineering Services Pty Ltd (Respondent).
On 16 August 2022, the Fair Work Commission was advised that the Respondent neither consented to nor opposed the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Gavin Bubb of the Applicant declared on 11 August 2022, setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
An Order has been separately issued in PR744851.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR744852>
- AGLC
- "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) v ARA Electrical Engineering Services Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 2173
- Case
- [2022] FWC 2173
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the FWC was whether the AMWU had satisfied the requirements of section 437 of the Fair Work Act to hold a ballot for protected action. This involved determining if there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and if the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the respondent. The union's statutory declaration, along with other materials, were pivotal in establishing these facts.
The FWC, after reviewing the statutory declaration of Gavin Bubb of the AMWU and the other documents, concluded that the union had indeed met the notification time requirement and had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the respondent. The statutory declaration detailed the steps taken by the union in bargaining with the respondent, which the FWC found to be sufficient evidence of genuine bargaining efforts. Consequently, the FWC found that the union had satisfied the prerequisites for a protected action ballot order. An order was separately issued in PR744851, confirming the FWC's decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.