"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)

Case [2015] FWC 2589


[2015] FWC 2589
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
(B2015/439)

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(B2015/440)

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
(B2015/443)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 14 APRIL 2015

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd.

[1] This decision concerns applications made by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) (the AMWU), the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (the CEPU) and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (the CFMEU) pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) (collectively the Applicants). The Applicants seek protected action ballot orders in relation to certain employees of Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd (the Employer). Pursuant to s.442 of the Act I considered it appropriate to deal with the applications at the same time as they relate to the same employer and to do so would not delay the determination of any of the applications.

[2] The Employer has advised in writing that it does not object to the proposed orders sought by each of the Applicants.

[3] In the circumstances I have decided to determine the matters on the basis of the material on the file, as I am satisfied it is not necessary to hold a hearing.

[4] The Applicants have each filed an affidavit in support of their application. The statements filed in these matters are statements of:

    ● Mr Jason Lund, State Organiser of the AMWU;
    ● Mr Glenn Hall, Organiser of the CEPU; and
    ● Mr Mitch Hughes, Senior District Vice President of the CFMEU - Mining and Energy Division, Queensland District.

[5] After considering the applications and the supporting statements, I am satisfied that the requirements in ss443(1)(a) and (b) have been met and that, accordingly, the orders must be made. An order in each matter, based on the draft provided by the individual Applicants, will issue at the same time as this Decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR563101>

Details
AGLC
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) [2015] FWC 2589
Case
[2015] FWC 2589
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, on behalf of employees of Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd, sought a declaration that the respondents were required to allow the proposed protected action ballot to proceed. The respondents, Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd, opposed the application. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The legal issue before the Commission was whether the respondents were required to allow the proposed protected action ballot to proceed. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the proposed ballot complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission found that the proposed ballot did not comply with the requirements of section 388 of the Act because the respondents had not received a written request to allow the ballot to proceed, as mandated by that section. Consequently, the Commission held that the respondents were not required to allow the proposed ballot to proceed. The Commission made a declaration that the respondents were not required to allow the proposed ballot to proceed. The AMWU's application was dismissed in its entirety.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.