Australian Workers' Union v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 798


[2024] FWC 798

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

(B2024/270)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 2 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (Ventia or Employer).

  1. On 28 March 2024, the Commission was advised that Ventia, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Patrick Wood on behalf of the AWU, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with them, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 15 May 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR772827.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, the Commission will also issue the Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, as sought in the Application. This is also the period required by the Australian Electoral Commission to conduct a ballot.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR772828>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 798
Case
[2024] FWC 798
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission, under Deputy President Hampton, received an application from the Australian Workers' Union (AWU) for a protected action ballot order regarding certain employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (Ventia). The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking to conduct a ballot for proposed protected industrial action. The employer, Ventia, did not object to the application, which led the Commission to decide to determine the matter based on the submitted documents without a hearing.

The legal issues before the Court involved verifying whether the AWU had genuinely attempted to negotiate with Ventia and if all conditions under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied. The AWU had to demonstrate that there was a notification period for the proposed agreement and that they had been diligently trying to reach an agreement with Ventia. The Court also needed to determine the closing date for voting in the ballot, considering the requirements of section 443(3)(c) of the Act and the practicalities of conducting a ballot.

Upon reviewing the materials, including the declaration from Mr. Patrick Wood on behalf of the AWU, the Deputy President was satisfied that all requirements had been met. The AWU had indeed been genuinely trying to reach an agreement and had followed the necessary procedures. Consequently, the Commission granted the application and set the closing date for voting in the ballot as 15 May 2024. This decision also established the ballot period for the purposes of section 448A(2) of the Act. Additionally, the matter was assigned for a compulsory conciliation conference to be conducted by another member of the Commission, with orders issued to ensure meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.