Australian Workers' Union v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 486


[2025] FWC 486

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

(B2025/262)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 18 FEBRUARY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (Ventia or Employer).

  1. I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 17 February 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties. The amendment concerned the extent of notice of industrial action to be provided.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ross Kumeroa, Offshore Alliance Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Ventia, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 March 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. Pursuant to section 443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the minimum period of written notice referred to in section 414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified five (5) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot questions in clause 5 of the Order.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR784473.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/263.

[2] This is, in effect, 11 working days from the making of the Order and was the specific date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR784474>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 486
Case
[2025] FWC 486
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order regarding employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd. The proposed ballot relates to an enterprise agreement and was made in the context of negotiations between the AWU and Ventia. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) also applied for a ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement. The court was required to determine whether the application met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer, and if all necessary conditions for conducting the ballot were met.

The Deputy President Hampton of the Fair Work Commission found that the AWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Ventia and that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 had been satisfied. The court was satisfied that the notification time for the proposed agreement was met and that the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with Ventia were documented in the declaration of Ross Kumeroa, Offshore Alliance Organiser. Furthermore, the court determined that the ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, was approved and authorised to conduct the ballot. The court also set the closing date for voting on the ballot as 6 March 2025, which was eleven working days from the date of the order. Additionally, it was decided that the minimum period of written notice for industrial action arising from the ballot would be five working days, a period agreed upon by both parties.

This decision addresses the procedural aspects of the application for a protected action ballot, ensuring that the legal framework of the Fair Work Act 2009 is adhered to. The Deputy President Hampton issued the necessary orders to facilitate the conduct of the ballot and the subsequent compulsory conciliation conference, assigning the matter to another Member of the Commission for further proceedings. The final orders included the specification of the ballot period, the appointment of the ballot agent, and the determination of the notice period for industrial action. This ruling ensures that the employees' right to conduct a ballot is upheld within the legal parameters set by the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.