Australian Workers' Union v Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 3077


[2024] FWC 3077

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd

(B2024/1436)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 6 NOVEMBER 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd (Sodexo or Employer).

  1. On 6 November 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application, as amended following discussions between the parties.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jason Lipscombe, National Organiser, Oil and Gas, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Sodexo, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 20 November 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The extended notice period of 5 working days applies to the items listed within Clause five (5) of the Order. 

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR781009.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the specific date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR781010>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 3077
Case
[2024] FWC 3077
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Sodexo Remote Sites Australia Pty Ltd. This request followed the AWU's attempts to reach an agreement with Sodexo, as outlined in a declaration by Jason Lipscombe, the National Organiser, Oil and Gas. The employer did not object to the application, which allowed the Commission to proceed without a hearing.

The legal issues involved determining whether the AWU had genuinely attempted to negotiate an agreement with Sodexo and if all statutory requirements were met to allow a protected action ballot. The Commission assessed the provided evidence, including the declaration by Lipscombe, to confirm that the AWU had indeed made genuine efforts to reach an agreement. Furthermore, the Commission was satisfied that the statutory notification period was met, and all necessary conditions for the ballot were fulfilled. The decision also acknowledged that exceptional circumstances warranted an extended notice period for the proposed industrial action.

The Fair Work Commission granted the application and issued an order for a ballot to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent. The Commission set the closing date for voting as 20 November 2024, allowing a total of 10 working days for the ballot period. Additionally, an extended notice period of 5 working days was established for the specified items within Clause five of the Order due to exceptional circumstances. A separate order was issued to assign another Commission member to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act, requiring all bargaining representatives to attend and negotiate meaningfully.

The Commission's final orders included the approval of the ballot, the appointment of the ballot agent, the specified voting period, and the extended notice period for certain industrial action items. The matter was assigned to another member for the conciliation conference, ensuring that all parties would be prepared to engage in meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.