Australian Workers' Union v SC Hydro Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 1155


[2025] FWC 1155

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

SC Hydro Pty Ltd

(B2025/659)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SLEVIN

SYDNEY, 28 APRIL 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of SC Hydro Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of SC Hydro Pty Ltd (SC Hydro or Employer) that are currently covered by the S C Hydro Pty Ltd AWU and CFMMEU Surface Works Greenfield Agreement 2021 - 2025.

  1. I note that the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1] have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 28 April 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Darren Cameron, Union Official, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with SC Hydro, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 May 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR786441.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Respectively, B2025/665 and B2025/669

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR786440>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v SC Hydro Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1155
Case
[2025] FWC 1155
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) has applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application concerns the employees of SC Hydro Pty Ltd who are covered by the SC Hydro Pty Ltd AWU and CFMMEU Surface Works Greenfield Agreement 2021-2025. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) and the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) have also made separate applications for a ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement. The employer, SC Hydro Pty Ltd, did not object to the application. The Commission decided to determine the matter based on the submitted documents without holding a hearing.

The legal issues before the court included whether the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with SC Hydro Pty Ltd and if the notification time for the proposed agreement had been met. The court was also required to determine if all the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been satisfied and if the ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), was authorised to conduct the ballot. Additionally, the court had to decide the closing date for voting.

The Deputy President, Slevin, concluded that the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with SC Hydro Pty Ltd and that all the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The court determined that CiVS was an approved ballot agent under section 468A of the Act and, therefore, authorised to conduct the ballot. The Deputy President also set the closing date for voting as 12 May 2025, which was 10 working days from the making of the order. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference with the other related matters. The Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference and will likely issue Directions to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

The Fair Work Commission has granted the Australian Workers' Union's application for a protected action ballot order. The ballot will be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) and will close on 12 May 2025. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. An Order has been separately issued in PR786441, and Directions will be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.