| [2024] FWC 3236 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union
v
Qantas Airways Limited
(B2024/1506)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 22 NOVEMBER 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Qantas Airways Limited
This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Qantas Airways Limited (Qantas or Employer).
I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing, and Kindred Industries Union (AMWU) have each made separate applications for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.[1]
On 22 November 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mark Fagan, Chief Operation Officer, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Qantas, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 December 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR781551.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2024/1507 and B2024/1508, respectively.
[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR781552>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union v Qantas Airways Limited [2024] FWC 3236
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3236
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the Fair Work Commission to determine was whether the AWU had fulfilled the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved verifying that the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Qantas and had complied with all procedural prerequisites for the ballot. The Commission also needed to ascertain whether the proposed voting period, as specified in the application, was appropriate.
In making its decision, the Commission reviewed the application and the declaration provided by Mark Fagan, Qantas' Chief Operation Officer, which detailed the AWU's bargaining efforts and their ongoing attempts to reach an agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the AWU had met all the necessary requirements for a ballot under section 443(1) of the Act. It was also determined that the proposed voting period was reasonable and aligned with the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Commission decided to issue an order for the ballot to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, which was approved as a ballot agent. The voting period was set to close on 6 December 2024. The matter was then referred to another member of the Commission to oversee the compulsory conciliation conference and ensure that meaningful negotiations took place between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.