Australian Workers' Union v Powertech Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 1462


[2025] FWC 1462

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

Powertech Pty Ltd

(B2025/827)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 28 MAY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Powertech Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Powertech Pty Ltd (Powertech or Employer).

  1. On 27 May 2025, the Commission was advised that Powertech did not, in effect, object to the Application if amended following discussions between the parties who had reached a consent position on the matter including an extended period of notice for the taking of industrial action.

  1. In the circumstances, I have granted leave to amend the application to reflect the agreed position and determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ross Kumeroa, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Powertech, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 June 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. By consent, the Commission has specified an extended written notice period of five (5) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot questions in clause 5 of the Order.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR787711.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR787712>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Powertech Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1462
Case
[2025] FWC 1462
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) made an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Powertech Pty Ltd (Powertech). The AWU sought the order in the context of ongoing industrial action negotiations with Powertech. The Commission was advised that Powertech had reached a consent position with the AWU regarding the application, including an extended period of notice for the taking of industrial action. The Deputy President Hampton granted leave to amend the application to reflect the agreed position and determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The primary legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the requirements under section 443 of the Act for a protected action ballot order were satisfied. Specifically, the Deputy President needed to determine if the AWU had genuinely tried to reach agreement with Powertech, and whether the proposed notification time was adequate. The Deputy President also needed to consider whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of written notice for taking industrial action, as requested by the parties.

The Deputy President concluded that the AWU had indeed been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Powertech, as evidenced by the declaration of Ross Kumeroa, the Organiser for the AWU. The Deputy President found that the notification time was sufficient and that all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The Commission determined that voting would close on 12 June 2025, establishing the ballot period. The Deputy President further found that there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of written notice for taking industrial action, setting a minimum period of five working days. This determination was made by consent between the parties.

The Deputy President issued an Order granting the AWU's application for a protected action ballot order. The Order specified that the ballot would be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), an approved ballot agent. The extended period of five working days for giving written notice of industrial action was also included in the Order. This matter will subsequently be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.