| [2025] FWC 599 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union
v
Mainteck Services Pty Limited
(B2025/297)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 27 FEBRUARY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Mainteck Services Pty Limited
This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Mainteck Services Pty Limited (Mainteck or Employer).
I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 26 February 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties.
As sought by Mainteck, the AWU has provided the following undertaking to the Commission and the Employer:
“In the event of industrial action, employees will maintain/provide a crew as necessary to provide urgent repair support to the Slab Caster in circumstances of a breakdown to ensure continuous casting and avoid the dumping of iron and associated safety issues.”
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Shane Klein, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Mainteck, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 10 April 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR784820.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2025/295.
[2] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR784821>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union v Mainteck Services Pty Limited [2025] FWC 599
- Case
- [2025] FWC 599
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the FWC related to whether the AWU had satisfied the requirements of section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act, including the need for a notification period and the genuineness of the union's efforts to reach an agreement with Mainteck. The AWU needed to demonstrate that it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with Mainteck and that there was a notification period for the proposed agreement. The Deputy President Hampton was satisfied, based on the material before him, that the AWU had met these requirements. The FWC also had to determine the closing date for the ballot, which the AWU and Mainteck agreed should be 10 April 2025.
The Deputy President Hampton issued an order approving the ballot and setting the closing date for the voting period. The FWC also issued an order for a compulsory conciliation conference to be held with the AMWU, which had made a separate application for a ballot order concerning the same proposed enterprise agreement. This conference aimed to facilitate meaningful negotiations between the parties. The matter was assigned to another FWC member to oversee the conciliation conference and to issue directions to ensure that the parties attended ready to negotiate.
This decision ensures that the ballot process can proceed while also providing an opportunity for further negotiations between the parties. The closing date for the ballot was set in accordance with the application and the requirements of the Fair Work Act, and the compulsory conciliation conference was scheduled to encourage resolution of the dispute.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.