Australian Workers' Union v Bradken Resources Pty Limited

Case [2025] FWC 2358


[2025] FWC 2358

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

Bradken Resources Pty Limited

(B2025/1274)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 12 AUGUST 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Bradken Resources Pty Limited

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers' Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Bradken Resources Pty Limited (Bradken or Employer).

  1. I note that the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)[1]  have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 12 August 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of James Newbold, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Bradken, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 26 August 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR790623.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters if orders are ultimately made. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1273 and B2025/1277, respectively.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR790624>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Bradken Resources Pty Limited [2025] FWC 2358
Case
[2025] FWC 2358
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission was presented with an application by the Australian Workers' Union (AWU) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Bradken Resources Pty Limited. The application was made in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) had also applied for a ballot order regarding the same proposed agreement. Bradken did not object to the AWU's application, leading the Deputy President to determine the matter on the papers without a hearing.

The legal issues before the court included whether the AWU had fulfilled the notification time requirement under section 443 of the Act, and if all the conditions in section 443(1) had been met. It was also necessary to determine if Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, the proposed ballot agent, was approved under section 468A of the Act. Additionally, the court needed to set the closing date for voting in accordance with section 443(3)(c) of the Act.

The Deputy President concluded that the AWU had met the notification time requirement and all conditions under section 443(1) of the Act. Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd was approved as a ballot agent under section 468A, and the court set the closing date for voting as 26 August 2025. This date was consistent with the 10 working days from the making of the order, which was the period sought in the application. The matter was to be assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A, alongside related matters if orders were made.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.