| [2025] FWC 2874 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union
v
Beach Energy Limited
(B2025/1503)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT | SYDNEY, 26 SEPTEMBER 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Beach Energy Limited – non-AEC ballot agent electronic voting
This is an application by the Australian Workers' Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Beach Energy Limited (Beach Energy or Employer).
On 25 September 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application. The parties reached a consent position on an emergency events clause being included in the Order, and agreed to delete one of the initially proposed forms of industrial action in clause 5 of the draft order.
In the circumstances, I have granted leave to amend the application and decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Carl Millard, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Beach Energy, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 16 October 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR792145.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 14 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR792146>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union v Beach Energy Limited [2025] FWC 2874
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2874
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue before the Commission was whether the AWU had satisfied the requirements of section 443 of the Act to conduct the ballot. This involved determining if there was a notification period for the proposed agreement and if all bargaining obligations had been met. Based on the declaration by the AWU Organiser, Carl Millard, and the evidence of genuine bargaining efforts, the Deputy President was satisfied that the AWU had met the legislative requirements.
The Deputy President granted leave to amend the application and decided to determine the matter without a hearing. The Deputy President set the ballot closing date as 16 October 2025, which also set the ballot period. An Order was issued separately to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act. The matter will be assigned to another Commission Member to oversee the conference and issue directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.
In conclusion, the Commission granted the AWU's application for a ballot order, setting the closing date and directing the conduct of a compulsory conciliation conference to encourage negotiations between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.