Australian Workers' Union v Atlas Programmed Marine Pty Ltd T/A Atlas Professionals

Case [2024] FWC 1027


[2024] FWC 1027

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers’ Union
v

Atlas Programmed Marine Pty Ltd T/A Atlas Professionals

(B2024/452)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 18 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Atlas Programmed Marine Pty Ltd T/A Atlas Professionals

  1. This is an application by The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Atlas Programmed Marine Pty Ltd T/A Atlas Professionals (Atlas Professionals or Employer).

  1. On 17 April 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application as amended to include reference to arrangements for emergency events and two additional ballot questions.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jason Lipscombe, National Organiser Oil and Gas, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Atlas Professionals, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act[1] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 1 May 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of five (5) working days written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR773675.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] [2023] FWC 1400.

[2] This is, in effect, eight (8) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR773676>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v Atlas Programmed Marine Pty Ltd T/A Atlas Professionals [2024] FWC 1027
Case
[2024] FWC 1027
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) applied for a protected action ballot order against Atlas Programmed Marine Pty Ltd T/A Atlas Professionals (Atlas Professionals). The application, filed under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, sought authorisation for a ballot concerning certain employees of Atlas Professionals. The employer did not object to the application, which was amended to include provisions for emergency events and additional ballot questions.

The legal issues before the court involved verifying whether the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Atlas Professionals, as required by section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the conditions for a ballot, such as the notification time and exceptional circumstances justifying an extended notice period, were met. The court also had to confirm the suitability of the ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), and set the closing date for voting.

The Deputy President concluded that the AWU had indeed been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Atlas Professionals, as evidenced by the declaration from the AWU’s National Organiser Oil and Gas, Jason Lipscombe. The court found that all the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act were fulfilled, and CiVS was an approved ballot agent under section 468A. The Deputy President set the closing date for voting as 1 May 2024, which also established the ballot period. The court found relevant exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of five working days for written notice of the industrial action. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A.

The final orders included authorisation for the ballot, with voting to close on 1 May 2024, and a requirement for all bargaining representatives to attend the compulsory conciliation conference. Directions were to be issued to ensure meaningful negotiations at the conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.