Australian Workers' Union v ASC Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 1118


[2024] FWC 1118

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Workers' Union
v

ASC Pty Ltd

(B2024/494)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

SYDNEY, 30 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of ASC Pty Ltd.

  1. This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of ASC Pty Ltd (ASC or Employer).

  1. On 29 April 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Simon Russell, Branch Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with ASC, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 June 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR774344.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, thirty (30) working days from the date of the Order, as sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR774345>

Details
AGLC
Australian Workers' Union v ASC Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1118
Case
[2024] FWC 1118
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of ASC Pty Ltd. ASC Pty Ltd did not object to the application, leading to the decision to proceed without a hearing. The application seeks to hold a ballot to allow employees to vote on protected action, a step the AWU claims is necessary due to failed negotiations with the employer over a proposed agreement.

The central legal issue before the Deputy President was whether the AWU had met all the statutory requirements to hold a protected action ballot. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the notification period for the proposed agreement was correctly calculated, and if the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with ASC Pty Ltd. The Deputy President reviewed the declaration from Simon Russell, Branch Organiser of the AWU, which detailed the bargaining process and the union's efforts to negotiate.

Having considered the evidence, the Deputy President concluded that the AWU had satisfied all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act. The declaration from the Branch Organiser provided sufficient evidence that the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement, and that a notification period was in place for the proposed agreement. Consequently, the Deputy President granted the application and ordered that the ballot be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission. Voting was to close by 12 June 2024, effectively setting a 30 working-day ballot period. The matter will now proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act, to be conducted by another member of the Commission.

This decision sets the stage for further negotiations between the AWU and ASC Pty Ltd, ensuring that the employees' rights and interests are properly represented in the process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.