| [2025] FWC 2297 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Australian Workers' Union
v
Applus Pty Ltd
(B2025/1246)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 7 AUGUST 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Applus Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Applus Pty Ltd (Applus or Employer).
On 6 August 2025, the Commission was advised that the parties had reached a consent position in relation to the inclusion of an extended notice period for taking protected industrial action. Applus also advised that the application, if amended, was not opposed.
In the circumstances, I have decided to amend the application to reflect the consent position reached and otherwise determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ross Kumeroa, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Applus, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 21 August 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The minimum extended notice period of five (5) working days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order.
An Order has been separately issued in PR790436.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR790439>
- AGLC
- Australian Workers' Union v Applus Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2297
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2297
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved verifying whether the AWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Applus, as required under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Commission needed to determine if the proposed extended notice period for taking industrial action met the conditions outlined in section 414(2)(b) of the Act, considering the exceptional circumstances. The application also required the approval of the ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, under section 468A of the Act.
The Deputy President Hampton determined that the AWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Applus, as evidenced by the declaration from the AWU's Organiser. The Commission was satisfied that all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been met. An extended notice period for industrial action was justified due to relevant exceptional circumstances. Consequently, the Commission amended the application to reflect the consent position reached by the parties and issued an order setting the closing date for voting at 21 August 2025. The Commission also directed that the ballot would be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, an approved ballot agent. This decision established the ballot period under section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter was to be assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference to ensure meaningful negotiations.
The Fair Work Commission issued an Order granting the AWU's application for a protected action ballot order, setting the closing date for voting on 21 August 2025. The Commission also determined that an extended notice period for industrial action was justified. The ballot was to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd, an approved agent. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.